Advocate Article - 3/3/05

MY SECOND SHORTEST ARTICLE:
How about a little controversy?

Controversies in the church are inescapable.  In the 2004 Book of Discipline, you’ll find a major controversy that informs every past and current debate we have in the church.  Sharp divisions over the trial and conviction of the Rev. Beth Stroud, domestic partner benefits in West Michigan conference, stances various bishops take on politics, what groups may receive money and for what purpose, boycotts against various corporations and environmental terrorism by various corporations find a home there.  Want to learn more?  Read the chapter entitled DOCTRINAL STANDARDS AND OUR THEOLOGICAL TASK.  United Methodists receive support for two divergent tasks.  On one hand, they stand firm on the historic doctrines of the church.  What we believe and core beliefs we hold dear theologically does not change once affirmed by General Conference.  In sum, “no person, no paper, no organization has the authority to speak officially for the United Methodist Church, this right having been reserved exclusively to the General Conference.”  On the other hand, United Methodists can subject those core theological perspectives to searing scrutiny.  Peruse carefully the section on our Theological Task?  (¶104 Section 4.)  Check out these excerpts.  “The theological task …serves a different function…we test various expressions of faith by asking: Are they true? Appropriate? Clear?   Cogent?   Credible? Are they based on love?  Do they provide the church with a witness that is faithful to the gospel as reflected in our living heritage…?  You may ask who can legitimately participate in the theological task. Is it limited to learned professors in seminary?  According to the Book of Discipline, the dialogue belongs to every congregation.  Laity, clergy, boards, agencies, theological schools even bishops of the church can foster this kind of dialogue, legitimately.  Diverse opinions are always welcome.  All this may occur with the Disciplinary understanding that the historic doctrinal heritage of the church is not sacrificed or changed.  Do you agree?  How can this be?  Read and see gentle reader.  (Luke 2:52)  And may the dialogue continue!!

 

CLOSE WINDOW